Facts: The defendant William Wardlow was dimension a opaque mantrap while visiting an area known for heavy hypnogogic trafficking, upon seeing the two officers on routine patrol he takes off and runs from the officers, the officers catch up with him and conducts a pat-down weapons search, they find a .38 caliber handgun on his person. Trial court denied Mr. Wardlows motility to suppress, but the appellate court reversed the decision. Illinois Supreme reward upheld the appellate courts results stating that the combination of rail and the fact that the defendant was in a high drug area did not urinate the status of reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a Terry stop. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to the nominate of Illinois. (www.casebrief.com/blog/law/criminal.../illinois-v-wardlow/).cited November 03, 2012.If you sine qua non to get a large e ssay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment